‘Prevalence’ of domestic abuse for those referred to Prevent
New research, commissioned by Counter Terrorism Policing, has revealed a ‘striking prevalence’ of domestic abuse in the lives of those referred to Prevent as being vulnerable to radicalisation.
Named ‘Project Starlight’, the research is the result of extensive collaboration between CTP, the Home Office, and a wide variety of charitable, community and third-sector organisations. It analysed referrals made to the counter-radicalisation Prevent programme in 2019, as part of CTP’s commitment to understanding the complex vulnerabilities that can be linked to extremism.
Out of a sample of 3,045 individuals, just over a third (1,076) had a link to a domestic abuse incident, either as an offender, victim, witness or a combination of all three. This is significantly higher than the prevalence of domestic abuse in the wider population, according to the best available estimates.
While not directly comparable, the Office of National Statistics data for 2018/19 indicates that 5.7 per cent of the population were victims of DA – while victims made up 15.4 per cent of Prevent referrals analysed as part of Project Starlight.
Detective Chief Superintendent Vicky Washington, National Co-ordinator for Prevent, said: “This initial research has resulted in some statistically significant data which cannot, and should not, be ignored. Project Starlight has indicated a clear overrepresentation of domestic abuse experiences in the lives of those who are referred to us for safeguarding and support. It is absolutely vital that we use this information to shape what we do, and strengthen our response across all of policing, not just in counter terrorism.”
Whilst the data showed a similar prevalence of domestic abuse incidents for both men and women referred to Prevent, men were most often recorded as an offender and women as a victim of abuse. Children (those under 16) were most likely to be a witness.
Where a link to a domestic abuse-related incident was identified, an Islamist ideology was recorded in 28 per cent of referrals, while Extreme Right Wing ideologies accounted for 18 per cent. Other categories included cases where vulnerability to radicalisation was present but with no clear ideology (21 per cent), or cases which were referred to Prevent but assessed as having no immediate radicalisation concerns (12 per cent). This was consistent with the wider Project Starlight cohort, and was consistent across age groups.
Washington added: “It is more important than ever that we look beyond traditional boundaries of what we do, and work towards understanding the bigger picture. What Project Starlight demonstrates is that vulnerabilities associated with radicalisation are complex and far-reaching.
“This research is not about stigmatising anyone or claiming that one factor necessarily links to another, it’s about us doing all we can to strengthen our understanding and approach, to ensure the right support is in place. And it’s about a joint mission to protect vulnerable people from all forms of harm.”
In light of these initial findings, Counter Terrorism Policing plans to develop this Project further by using the research to inform ongoing work alongside wider safeguarding practitioners, as well as using it to improve understanding and training for both counter terrorism and police safeguarding practitioners. Further research is also planned to widen the initial data-set, and examine more closely the link between domestic abuse and the pathway to radicalisation.